Florida Jeff wrote:
I watched a good deal of the Day 2 proceedings. She stood up exceedingly well to direct questioning and fell into no trap set by senators with half her brain horsepower. Her responses to the questions on her history were excellent, and in particular to actions she took while at Harvard. An intellect like that is what is needed on the USSC. Insight, wit, knowledge and respect for the law. In fact, she spoke with brutal candor and the courage that allows for the kinds of influential decisions of the sort that Thurgood Marshall and other influential justices wrote. I think that she did a fine job of dispelling the rumors and innuendo about her believed by people who would rather listen to the blather of a pandering radio talk show host. She will do well, and uphold the Constitution.

REALLLLY  JEFF???