But the issue I am bringing up is dose the state have the legal right to go into a community and take all the children on a warrant to find one girl?

I do not believe the state acted on the basis of finding one child because I don't know that was the sole basis. I haven't seen the warrant. What I do know is that in the cases of child welfare if the state worker believes a child is in danger (ie. leaving young girls to go back
to that compound to be forcibly raped)
they are directed, by legislation, to remove that child and/or children for the childs own protection. The state can't hand over these
children to "mothers" who would allow the forcible rape of their female children.

Hey, if there is proof that these young female children are not forced to have sex with the older men in that cult, that their mothers aren't coercing them to have sex with these same men, then they should all go back to that compound. However from everything I have been reading and the cults own admissions it makes it extremely hard for me to
believe that there isn't forcible rape of young girls going on in that compound. And I wouldn't hand back a dog much less a boy to "mothers" that would stand by and allow their daughters to be forcibly raped.


Compare it to: If one person in a town committed a crime, would the state break into every home in that town?

We're dealing with the welfare of children and the legislation which law enforcment and social services must follow. It is a different animal altogether. A social service worker cannot leave a child in a home if they believe they are at risk of abuse.