We're dealing with the welfare of children and the legislation which law enforcment and social services must follow. It is a different animal altogether. A social service worker cannot leave a child in a home if they believe they are at risk of abuse
Sorry but I have heard that "do it for the children" defense so many times it automatically raises the alarm bells.

Hey, if there is proof that these young female children are not forced to have sex with the older men in that cult, that their mothers aren't coercing them to have sex with these same men, then they should all go back to that compound.
There should first be proof that they were forced and coerced before they were taken away! What the Hell happened to innocent until proven guilty! When did the Constitution change to guilty until proven innocent?

If they are found not to have forced and coerced they children then it will also reinforce everything they have been taught that the state is out to get them and should never be trusted. Sorry but I will always demand proof before children are siezed and removed from their parents. I have already read articles where anti-gun nuts think that the children of all gun owners should be taken away because they are teaching their children that they have a right to have guns.


John - NRA - Lifer
"We have 8,000 INS agents protecting our borders against illegal aliens and terrorists while we have over 100,000 IRS agents chasing working people." - Bill Rollyson
image
Visit my Help Board for all kinds of great links Visit a Conservative Bulliten Board
Visit a Shooting Sports link source Visit a board filled with tips on popular programs